Lawsuit Sundance Vacations

Class Action Lawsuit Against Sundance Vacations

In May 2021, Emily Walsh filed a class-action lawsuit against Sundance Vacations, citing violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and seeking damages for these alleged infractions. This lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey, implicates the vacation company in unlawful telemarketing practices.

Walsh, the plaintiff, claims that Sundance Vacations’ intrusive telemarketing calls breached the TCPA, a law aimed at curbing such intrusions.

Sundance Vacations Lawsuit

This class action lawsuit, filed on May 5, 2021, in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey, revolves around alleged TCPA violations. Essentially, the plaintiff, Emily Walsh, claims that Sundance Vacations violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), a federal statute designed to protect consumers from unsolicited telemarketing calls.

If found guilty, the company could face severe penalties, as the TCPA violations can lead to hefty fines. And with Walsh demanding a jury trial, it’s clear that she’s determined to see this through to the end. This lawsuit isn’t just about one individual’s grievance; it’s a class action suit, which implies that other consumers may have had similar experiences with the company.

Parties involved

Emily Walsh isn’t a solitary figure in this lawsuit. She is the attorney for hundreds, possibly thousands, of people who claim Sundance Vacations’ actions have wronged them. On the flip side, Sundance Vacations, Inc., the defendant in the lawsuit, is a company known for offering discount travel services. However, it’s their alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that landed them in hot water.

The suit itself was filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey, with Judge Lois H. Goodman presiding over the case. Goodman, an experienced judge, is tasked with weighing the facts and making a decision that could have far-reaching implications.

The cause of action

Diving into the heart of the lawsuit, you’ll find that the cause of action hinges on alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by Sundance Vacations. The plaintiffs claim that Sundance’s telemarketing practices cross the line into illegality. They assert that the company hasn’t only infringed on consumers’ rights to privacy but also violated federal law.

To get a clearer picture of the situation, let’s break down the allegations:

  • Sundance Vacations is accused of violating 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 of the TCPA, a piece of legislation designed to safeguard consumer protection rights when it comes to telemarketing.
  • The company’s alleged telemarketing practices involve tactics that are explicitly prohibited under this law.
  • The plaintiffs have demanded a jury trial to address these TCPA violations.

Relief being sought

In the lawsuit against Sundance Vacations, the plaintiffs are seeking monetary compensation for the alleged violations of the TCPA. They argue that their rights were infringed due to Sundance’s telemarketing violations, which include making unsolicited calls. The damage these violations have caused is the crux of the relief being sought.

The plaintiffs aren’t just seeking redress for themselves; they’re fighting for all affected consumers who’ve endured the same intrusive practices. They believe Sundance should be held accountable for their alleged TCPA non-compliance, and the lawsuit is their way of ensuring this.

The financial compensation pursued serves two purposes. First and foremost, it aims to make up for any losses suffered by the plaintiffs as a result of these unwanted calls. Secondly, it’s a stern message to Sundance Vacations and similar companies, reminding them of the legal obligations they’ve got toward consumers’ rights.

Lawsuit Sundance Vacations

Key events and timeline

Here’s a quick rundown of the key events:

  • May 5, 2021: The lawsuit, WALSH v. SUNDANCE VACATIONS, INC., was filed.
  • The case is currently in the discovery phase in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey.
  • Ari Hillel Marcus, an attorney, is representing the plaintiff, Emily Walsh.

Key arguments

Sundance allegedly used deceptive practices, promising dream vacations at affordable prices. But what you, along with the other class members, allegedly found were hidden costs, undisclosed terms, and failed promises. This is the essence of the false advertising claim.

Furthermore, the breach of contract claim stems from Sundance’s alleged failure to deliver services as promised. You might’ve paid for a vacation package, expecting to enjoy a stress-free holiday. But if the allegations are true, you are left dealing with unexpected issues and costs.

The aim of the lawsuit is twofold. First, it’s to deter companies like Sundance from engaging in such practices. Second, it’s to seek compensation for the harm you and others have suffered due to these alleged deceptive practices.

Current status

The case, which Emily Walsh filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey on May 5, 2021, is still very much active. The class action lawsuit brought against Sundance Vacations is currently in the discovery phase. This means that both sides are gathering and preparing evidence for the impending legal proceedings.


If found guilty, Sundance Vacations may have to provide compensation for damages, impacting their financial status. But the implications don’t stop there. They may also face reputation damage, which can affect their customer base and future business prospects.

Moreover, the lawsuit serves as a stern reminder to other businesses. It highlights the importance of adhering to TCPA regulations and conducting ethical telemarketing practices. Companies that don’t comply could find themselves in similar legal predicaments.


Many people saw this legal action as a chance to voice their complaints and seek justice. Among the reactions, several key trends were observed:

  • Relief: Several consumers expressed relief that the class action lawsuit was finally taking place. This was seen as a step forward in bringing to light the alleged wrongdoings of Sundance Vacations.
  • Support: Many supported the legal action, viewing it as a necessary measure to curb the deceptive practices of Sundance Vacations.
  • Mixed Expectations: Despite the overall support, there was a degree of skepticism. Some consumers weren’t sure if the lawsuit would result in any significant changes.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *